Pulling SEC filings + quote and writing the call…

AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
Next earnings Jul 29, 2026 · consensus $3.43 EPS, $3.96B rev
Stale FY2013 filing data can't underwrite a 2026 call; current price implies a story the numbers here don't tell.
Diluted EPS $-2.35 · FY2013
The core problem is that the fundamentals provided are from fiscal 2013 while the price and market cap are live 2026 figures, so the two cannot be reconciled into a clean valuation. On the trailing data shown, AEM is a loss-maker: FY2013 net income of -$407M (down 230.8% YoY), diluted EPS of -$2.35, a net margin of -63.5% and ROE of -13.7%. Retained earnings swung to -$513M and cash fell 53.3% to $139M while long-term debt rose 20.5% to $1.00B — a deteriorating year by any reading. The net income history is also whipsawing (+$86.5M, +$332M, -$569M, +$311M, -$407M from 2009 to 2013), which is exactly what you'd expect from a gold/silver miner whose earnings track commodity prices and periodic asset write-downs rather than a durable compounding business.
Valuation on the data as given is non-informative: a P/E of -70.9 reflects negative EPS, and the P/S of 130.2 is an artifact of dividing an $83.3B market cap by stale $640M FY2009 revenue — the only revenue figure present, since FY2010-2013 revenue is blank. There is no usable current-revenue, current-earnings, or current-balance-sheet figure to relate today's $166.66 price to. That alone caps any conviction: I can describe the company's 2013 condition, but I cannot tell you whether the 2026 stock is cheap or expensive.
Is AEM a buy? The one-page verdict, explained →
HOLD means own it, don't chase it — harvesting premium against the position matches the verdict.
Educational template, not a trade recommendation. Strikes and premiums are Black-Scholes model estimates from the last close and 30-day realized volatility — real chains, spreads and IV will differ. Options involve substantial risk.
| Line item | FY09 | FY10 | FY11 | FY12 | FY13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $640M | — | — | — | — |
| Gross profit | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating income | $159M | $478M | -$341M | $911M | $132M |
| Net income | $86.5M | $332M | -$569M | $311M | -$407M |
| Diluted EPS | $0.55 | $2.00 | -$3.36 | $1.81 | -$2.35 |
| Net margin | 13.5% | — | — | — | — |
10-year statements — income, cash flow, balance sheet & CSV export →
Annual figures from SEC 10-K XBRL filings. Open the filing links below for full statement detail.
Computed from SEC XBRL annual figures + the current quote. EV and ROIC use long-term + current debt where filed; estimates, not investment advice.
Sources: SEC EDGAR (CIK 0000002809, latest 6-K filed 2026-07-02) · EODHD · Proprietary analysis · as of 6/21/2026, 3:12:25 PM.
AI-generated analysis, produced by our proprietary engine from SEC filing data.
Investment recommendation produced by TENK/calls (tenkcalls.com), Luxembourg. Completed Jun 21, 2026, 11:12 AM ET. Ratings & methodology: definitions · All recommendations to date: track record · Conflicts: disclosures. Not investment advice.
Research and education only — not financial advice. TENKis not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer and gives no personalized advice. Every call is impersonal — identical for all users, generated on a schedule from SEC filings plus a delayed/third-party price feed — may be wrong or out of date, and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. The operator and an affiliated trading operation may hold or trade the securities TENK rates; see Disclosures. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Do your own research.
| Bridgewater Associates | 88.7K sh | $18.0M |
As of each fund’s latest quarterly 13F — a delayed snapshot, not a live position. All tracked funds →
Source: EODHD. Yield = trailing-12-month dividends ÷ price.
Disclosed under the STOCK Act
Self-reported periodic transaction reports (STOCK Act). Amounts are disclosed ranges; a trade may be a spouse's. Disclosures lag the trade by up to ~45 days. Source: House Clerk + Senate eFD.
1195 tracked peers · median
Recent news tone vs the market's typical (which skews positive). A soft signal, not a recommendation.