
Next earnings ≈ Aug 14, 2026 · est. from filing cadence
Mixed signals in the latest filings.
This call stands until the filings change it — the engine re-rates on new 10-K/10-Q/8-K facts, never on price moves. Hit Watch above to follow FTW (Pro alerts fire the moment a rating flips), or catch every change in Saturday’s Flip Side. How to read a call
PRESIDIO PRODUCTION Co shows limited reported revenue.
On these fundamentals, FTW screens as SELL on the SEC figures.
Is FTW a buy? The one-page verdict, explained →
SELL verdict, defined risk: profits into weakness down to the short strike; max loss is the net debit.
Educational template, not a trade recommendation. Strikes and premiums are Black-Scholes model estimates from the last close and 30-day realized volatility — real chains, spreads and IV will differ. Options involve substantial risk.
Computed from SEC XBRL annual figures + the current quote. EV and ROIC use long-term + current debt where filed; estimates, not investment advice.
The daily Brief delivers our freshest calls, rating flips and the filings behind them — every morning, free.
Sources: SEC EDGAR (CIK 0002083125, latest 10-Q filed 2026-05-15) · EODHD · as of 7/15/2026, 8:10:36 PM.
Rule-based analysis, generated automatically from SEC filing data.
Investment recommendation produced by TENK/calls (tenkcalls.com), Luxembourg. Completed Jul 15, 2026, 4:10 PM ET. Ratings & methodology: definitions · All recommendations to date: track record · Conflicts: disclosures. Not investment advice.
Research and education only — not financial advice. TENKis not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer and gives no personalized advice. Every call is impersonal — identical for all users, generated on a schedule from SEC filings plus a delayed/third-party price feed — may be wrong or out of date, and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. The operator and an affiliated trading operation may hold or trade the securities TENK rates; see Disclosures. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Do your own research.
Disclosed smart-money activity in FTW, but no clear buy consensus.
Different disclosure clocks — Form 4s file within days, Congress PTRs lag up to ~45 days, and 13F holdings are a quarterly snapshot (up to ~4.5 months old). A disclosed-accumulation view, not live correlation.
| ExodusPoint Capital | 44.2K sh | $487K |
As of each fund’s latest quarterly 13F — a delayed snapshot, not a live position. All tracked funds →
Schedule 13D/13G filings disclosing a >5% stake in the company. A 13D declares intent to engage — read the filing; a 13G is a passive holding. Percent is the percent-of-class stated on the cover page. Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain).
Registration, merger-proxy and tender-offer activity from SEC filings (S-4, DEFM14A/PREM14A, SC 14D9, SC TO-I/TO-T, 425) — read the filing; not all S-4s are takeovers (they also cover exchange offers and debt swaps). Role reflects the form’s semantics; a merger proxy and merger communications don’t name a side. Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain).
No unusual settlement fails — 163 shares failed to deliver on the latest published day.
FTW fails-to-deliver history — every published settlement day →
Aggregate CNS settlement fails on the latest published day, vs this name’s trailing median. From SEC fails-to-deliver data (published twice monthly) — a settlement metric, not short interest.
Auditor changes (8-K Item 4.01) and restatements (Item 4.02) are verified against the filing’s tagged items; going-concern flags key on the “substantial doubt” disclosure phrase in a 10-K/10-Q — review the filing itself. Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain).
Source: EODHD. Yield = trailing-12-month dividends ÷ price.
1178 tracked peers · median
SEC correspondence
FTW SEC comment-letter history — every letter and response →
SEC staff comment letters (UPLOAD) questioning the company’s disclosures and its written responses (CORRESP), from the SEC’s filing review. Reviews are routine and this is not an assertion of wrongdoing; correspondence is released about 20 business days after a review concludes, so dates reflect the letter itself, not its release. Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain).